Journal

Notes on arts and craft.

Is AI Art Real Art? Six Answers for Artists

Is AI Art Real Art? Six Answers for Artists

As generative AI floods creative fields with convincing work, artists face pressing questions about whether their effort, authenticity, and voice still matter. This article, the second in a series, responds to the six most critical questions posed in "Six Critical Questions for Artists," arguing that human creation remains immutably valuable. Drawing on listener research, streaming industry data, and the concept of a "central contract" between artist and audience, it examines why the will to create stands apart from validation and profit, why an artist's limited influences produce more distinctive work than vast training data, and why offloading foundational creative decisions to generative tools distances a piece from its creator. What emerges is a framework for evaluating art as the testimony of a perspective, and a case for why effort, authenticity, and craft remain rational in the age of AI.

Six Critical Questions For Artists

Six Critical Questions For Artists

As generative AI produces convincing creative work, artists are confronting a question that once seemed abstract: As human creators what sets them apart? This piece organizes these questions into six distinct lines of reflection,on uniqueness, marketability, authenticity, style, effort, and the nature of influence itself separating them from the tangled, often conflated arguments that dominate public debate about AI (for instance, distinguishing artistic merit from the ethics of training-data compensation). Rather than offering answers, the article functions as a structured exercise: each question is paired with a specific prompt for self-examination, inviting artists to locate where their sense of creative worth actually comes from before deciding how to respond to AI's rise. It's the first installment of a two-part series, with proposed answers to follow.

Reassessing Theory

Reassessing Theory

Anti-theory rhetoric in the arts often mistakes the misuse of a framework for its essence. This piece traces distrust of theory to painful personal experiences and to guilt-by-association with oppressive institutions, then returns to the word's Greek root — theōria, "a way of seeing" — to recast theory as a descriptive, reflective tool rather than a prescriptive rulebook. Theory sharpens practice by deepening intentionality and pattern recognition, but claims no primacy over it. The real target of critiques linking theory to colonization or cultural domination is prescriptive misuse by people and institutions, not the framework itself. Properly understood, theory is a neutral toolkit with its meaning shaped entirely by how communities choose to use it.

What Are Somatic Exercises? Beginner’s Guide (2025)

What Are Somatic Exercises? Beginner’s Guide (2025)

Somatic exercises are mindful movement practices designed to enhance the mind-body connection, improve physical awareness, and regulate the nervous system. Rooted in the Greek term soma (body), these exercises integrate physical movement with mental focus to foster well-being, reduce stress, and refine motor control. This article explores somatic approaches such as "Horizonal Procession," which enhances creative focus through spatial awareness, and "Tracing the Path," a method that refines movement precision for musicians. With practical exercises for beginners and insights on integrating somatic practices into daily life, this guide offers a foundation for using movement as a tool for greater ease, creativity, and self-awareness.